12/15/05
NC HOMELESS CONFERENCE:Raleigh, NC. 29-30 November 2005.
Looks like a good crowd. The official report given is 540 persons—good growth over the nine years. The staff reported that 163 people registered for the inaugural conference.
Spent some time last night riding around the hotel—without ever getting close enough to see it. Pretty frustrating, to say the least. Then, today, in the light, I can see how close I was so many times. It amazes how I can go to the same hotel & drive the same road every year & still have such trouble every year.
I recognize several people from past years & from other events. There are many 1st timers, as always. It is good for new people to attend. I'm particularly pleased to see the Hospitality House of Boone staff and the Wintergreen PSHP staff.
One of the original purposes of the conference is to discuss access to the largest funding process for homeless programs: US Department of Housing and Urban Development (
HUD) Continuum of Care (CoC) community planning process.
OPENING REMARKS:The conference opened with inspirational remarks from people in various stages of transition out of homelessness—3 people telling their stories, some with the humorous honesty of self-reflection. A better panel could not have been picked. A young man who worked through the system, a young lady who fought the system until she accepted it, and an educated mother who could not make it through the system & gives a picture of all the things not working.
These speakers present how the system could work when it is flexible & supportive. It is good that the young people are here to learn a little about what does work. Flexibility in acceptance of a consumer's presentation & ways to think about that presentation is encouraged by these panels.
Another aspect is training that “the system” is not the only way to attack a problem—it can be the hardest way. The system is funded consistently; however, there are times when the costs of doing business are high—emotional and time costs specifically.
The panel also highlighted acceptance by service providers, attached to persistence in approaching consumers, as another feature of “what works”. A correlate is the persistence of the consumer—which is enhanced by the relationship between provider & consumer. This old lesson is a good one to re-visit regularly. Focus on helping the consumer meet their own goals is the real work. By working for the consumer & not asking the consumer to meet our needs more energy can go into problem solving.
This was a great session & I hope I can find the transcript online.
CONVERSATIONS:Some consideration of the future of the NorthWest Continuum of Care (NWCoC) through a couple of conversations over the two days.
First, I spoke with a colleague about the prospects of HUD funding for homeless projects. It is the speculation that HUD will continue to not fund projects that do not focus on permanent housing for chronically homeless persons. This is bolstered by rumor that services-only projects are not being renewed in some areas. Rumor has it.... What we don't have is the facts about why such a program would be cut—that would take the fear out of the prospect.
Certainly, the McKinney-Vento Act gained such momentum because of the vets sleeping on the Capitol Mall. It is vets, chronically homeless singles, and “chronic inebriates” who have gotten the bulk of the funding lately. It seems a logical step to only fund housing for these hard to serve persons.
While all this is going on there is plenty of attempts to shift that funding to other populations (ie, families).
There was discussion of how the CoC community planning process can reach beyond the seed funding of the US treasury. If I remember correctly, HUD reps have said as much all along--”look beyond HUD for $$”. Strategically, I would like to see NWCoC work out of its center as an independent nonprofit networking throughout the communities it serves & building the infrastructure. This dovetails with my vision of my NRBH job: to develop housing capacity for consumers throughout our catchment area using a variety of community resources—sort of a strengths-based model that still needs some work & planning.
Overall, the conference opened up some conversations leading to ways to continue using local capacity. Included is the opportunity to work with the fire marshal—which previously held an adverserial position.
WORKSHOPS:Several workshops related to NPOs becoming landlords were available. I went briefly to the nonprofit/local government session—it was a presentation of CASA & Wake County. CASA is the housing developer created by area authority of Wake County in 1992. Brought up the idea of mixed income housing in tax credit developments. This partnership produced fruit in the form of a well-managed supportive housing owner/operator.
The Afternoon workshop was presented by a nonprofit supportive housing developer from Portland, Oregon. His company buys, builds, rehabs housing—mostly apartments—in communities, to create "recovery" communities. They own 1400 units & service them with a set of for-profit companies that employ consumers/ former consumers & provide an income stream for the company. He mentioned that there are rules in OR where they can evict on 48 hours notice for certain lease violations (ie, use of intoxicants as a lease violation). He also mentioned that the goal is to use the 48 hours to provide an intervention. He mentioned that he had only evicted 10 times.
Some discussion about the challenges facing some of the nonprofits, including cost of housing, gentrification, rural vs. Urban, neighborhoods. Presenter mentioned that he creates housing that is better than others in the neighborhood & that he takes an active role in neighborhood associations. The company is a large landlord in the areas where they work. These are all elements of the company's success.
NCCEH (
North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness)
North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness meeting where they presented on achievements for 2005. These included advocacy network building where the coalition staff (1 person) is now called upon by legislators (state & federal) for expert opinion & they are able to influence lawmakers positively. This truly is a success for a social issue that lost its sexiness years ago.
All this put me in a reflective mood about what my goals are. Essentially,:
--access to affordable, decent, safe housing for consumers.
Relationships with developers
relationships with landlords
con plan
advocate for use of resources
survey of needs
green building technologies
leader in supportive housing services
The materials from these workshops are reported to be placed on the
DHHS homeless website following the conference.
ADVOCACY 101 WORKSHOP:Do ask for what you want, specifically—in terms of introducing a bill through signing up an original co-sponsor (hopefully, bi-partisan co-sponsors). Job then is to get people to sign on as a co-sponsor—more co-sponsors, more support.
"you are the expert"--why people will listen to "me". Part of the process is to educate the listener.
Process:
educate on the issues, problems, solutions
ask for ways to solve the problem (this is what politicians want to do--"solve problems")
build relationship
Email is good way to contact Hill staff (formula for email address available through coalition website)
want to get the name & contact info for Legislative Assistant for a particular issue.
Then build relationship with that person.
"The greater the apparent effort, the more attention given by the staffer"--so, personalized faxes & localized information in bulk letters. Pay attention to subject lines & re-wording of form materials.
Always give the ask, after some brief background, in specific bullet points. With local facts, figures, stories.
HOUSING FIRST WORKSHOP:Debbie Webster, division Best Practice, homeless contact/ PATH coordinator
Mainstream service—available as long as the consumer needs it.
Housing First is evidence-based/best practice model
Housing First is taking services to the consumer
The new service definitions require housing—whenever they go into play.
Specifically designed for homeless SPMI consumers. There is some empirical evidence that this model can be generalized to general chronic homeless population.
PATH is time-limited CM for persons on the street & not-engaged. (research this program & getting funding)
A representative from a PATH-funded Housing First Program in Wilmington NC expressed the following points:
"community-benefits"
started in Wilmington with some agency funds ($5000) & some NAMI money.
8 apts—2 persons per apt—helps with affordability
similar to Safe Haven model in that people can take time to adjust to living in unit.
NOTES, ETC:Cost/benefit analysis of housing v. Homelessness may go a long way to expanding funding locally.
One message I brought from the conference is to take a big picture role & look for ways to solve bigger problems—then the problem is affordable housing not homelessness. Or, affordable housing for low & very-low income persons as a specific subset of the affordable housing problem in Watauga County.
So, how can I best use my time in Ashe County? I could stay all day. I could work on the housing stock inventory. I could advocate for homeless services. I could work with CM & build those relationships. It will be the day that the revolving fund will start (maybe). Ask CM what they need.
rmcox